Government · Strict Scrutiny
by Strict Scrutiny
Strict Scrutiny is a podcast about the United States Supreme Court and the legal culture that surrounds it. Hosted by three badass constitutional law professors-- Leah Litman, Kate Shaw, and Melissa Murray-- Strict Scrutiny provides in-depth, accessible, and irreverent analysis of the Supreme Court and its cases, culture, and personalities. Each week, Leah, Kate, and Melissa break down the latest headlines and biggest legal questions facing our country, emphasizing what it all means for our daily lives. Whether you’re a lawyer or law student, or you’re just here for the messy legal drama, Strict Scrutiny has you covered. New episodes out every Monday… plus bonuses whenever SCOTUS takes away another one of our rights.
Showing 20 · updated from the feed
Position in the Government chart (US), last 90 days.
Where Strict Scrutiny ranks today in each Apple Podcasts chart (US, Sep 20, 2026).
A curated, balanced selection of Apple Podcasts reviews.
While I largely agree with the political ideology presented in Strict Scrutiny, the podcast frequently engages in personal attacks and exaggerated statements about those who do not agree. If you’re looking for a journalistic approach to legal news, this isn’t for you. If you’re looking for a hyper-partisan take - you found a good podcast. I would self-identify as a member of the DSA but the approach still bothers me.
I am so glad this podcast exists. It's killing a few birds with one stone (and now perhaps another with CLE). It is somehow informative beyond a superficial level, entertaining, and consoling. My only qualification is that I could do with less actual yelling at us from some guests (I won't mention gender here, but...). I like when the hosts vocalize our pain, but this does generally go straight into our ears. I tend to stop listening to those. Otherwise, thank you!
I never miss this podcast. These gals are so darn brilliant with such quick wits. Their personalities mesh well. SCOTUS is the biggest threat to democracy in my lifetime. Thanks for all you do to raise awareness!
Love the podcast. Never miss an episode. In connection with the recent Slaughter case, can you discuss why Article 1, Section 8, which contains a long list of powers held by Congress, is never cited much less argued as the source of Congress’ power to establish administrative agencies that are independent from the President (via, eg, removal for cause provisions). Section 8 lists specific powers to regulate commerce; coin money, regulate the value thereof, and foreign coin; establish the post office and post roads; promote science and the arts. These in addition to numerous powers to regulate the military, declare war, exercise exclusive jurisdiction over DC, and finally the “necessary and proper clause.” Why doesn’t this extensive list at least support equal voice held by Congress with the President over agencies like the SEC, FTC, FCC etc., much less support an argument that their express enumeration demonstrates that Congress holds greater power over these agencies than the President. Ignoring Article 1, Section 8 in a debate against the unitary executive theory has always puzzled me.
The name of the podcast indicates that it’s a legal podcast and filled with critical thought. It’s neither. It’s almost entirely super biased editorializing with no intersection with the law. Sometimes I find it funny, though probably not in the way the hosts intend. It’s interspersed with awkward vulgarity and unsupported positions. If you want an insensible hyper liberal opinion echo chamber —then you’ll probably enjoy it. If you consider yourself moderate or liberal you probably won’t. In either case, if you’re coming for legal analysis or to challenge or expand your views on issues of law, you won’t find it here.
I love this podcast almost all of the time. But y’all, it’s not 2018 anymore. We all know JVN is an abusive creator of hostile work environments. JVN does not deserve to be platformed, particularly by a group that cares so much for human rights. They actively violate the rights of others, and entertainment value cannot excuse this. I will return my rating to 5 stars when the hosts address this misstep and pledge not to platform JVN or ANYONE who abuses subordinates at work.
We strive to present a balanced view by showing a diverse range of reviews from Apple Podcasts.
Popular shows in Government, for your next listen.
Daily updated Apple Podcasts rankings for the United States.
Here you find the Apple Podcasts chart positions of Strict Scrutiny, its latest episodes to listen to directly, and reviews from listeners. Rankings are updated daily for the United States.
Questions or issues? Reach us at hello@reason.fm