True Crime · Audiochuck
by Audiochuck
For over 30 years, the murder of 23-year-old Dana Ireland haunted the island of Hawai‘i, leaving behind a tangled web of suspicion, betrayal, and unanswered questions. Three men were convicted. The case was closed. Justice was served. Or so everyone thought. Hosted by Amanda Knox - an exoneree, journalist, public speaker and best-selling author - this Season of THREE takes you deep into a case that was never as simple as it seemed. Through never-before-heard interviews and unwarranted access, we’ll walk you through this notorious crime and how it impacted three families - The Ireland’s, The Schweitzer’s and The Pauline’s all in very different ways. And the shocking discovery that changed everything. Someone got away with murder. Until now. This is THREE Season 2: Murder in Vacationland.
Showing 20 · updated from the feed
Position in the True Crime chart (US), last 90 days.
Where THREE ranks today in each Apple Podcasts chart (US, Oct 2, 2026).
A curated, balanced selection of Apple Podcasts reviews.
I listen to Crime Junkie all the time and came across episode one of season one on their channel. I finished season 1 and 2 in two days. I love all the detail on the cases along with the deeper explanations of how things like wrongful convictions can happen. Knowledge is power.
I enjoyed the coverage of this story and how the host was able to convey the story without overwhelming the listener with her own story. She somehow managed to tell multiple stories without allowing the victim’s suffering to be ignored. The Podcast allowed you to easily follow what in the end was a tragedy of the justice system as a whole. I am glad there are organizations like the innocence project and this highlights their importance.
Season 1 was excellent and you can tell when professionals are at the wheel. I wanted to hear more about the actual case in season 2 but Amanda Knox managed to insert her story way too much. She treated herself as the main character and the actual victims of who she is “reporting“ on as a secondary. It’s a compelling story and I would have preferred to hear it from the hosts from season 1 who are actual journalists, and don’t center themselves by making themselves the story.
This podcast provides an in depth look at a case that is plagued with questions, and allows for various perspectives on what happened that led to the murder of a teenage girl. However, there are some issues: most importantly, the perspective of one of the killers’ close family friends allowed for victim blaming. This podcast aired, quote, “if she [skylar, the victim] was really having all those problems with the girls… why would she go with them?” Why is the podcast seeking to elevate the voice of someone who would blame Skylar for her demise? Additionally, some of the people interviewed did not offer anything of note (for example, the neighbor of Rachel). The podcast could have been shorter and more interesting by eliminating these. My final comment is that there was a lot of turning up and turning down my volume to try and understand what was being said. We have the technology and most of these were recent interviews so I’m not sure why so much of the recording was unclear.
Why are you talking about how provocatively a 15yo was dressed and how much makeup she’s wearing? She’s 15. Has nothing to do with whether or not she’s guilty of a crime. Gross. Why do the hosts keep describing how hot they are and describing their physical attributes? Irrelevant and weird. I will not be continuing. I’m not saying these girls didn’t do something heinous and I won’t form an opinion bc I’m stopping halfway through ep 2, but I’m not inclined to take these cops’ or hosts’ word for it on anything. It’s feeling like very unreliable narration claiming not to sensationalize the case but relying on misogynistic tropes used towards teen girls to justify anything weird they say about them. Nope.
Season 2 is interesting! I like the original audio clips and interviews. Like other reviews have stated, it is disruptive for the narrator, Amanda Knox, to keep inserting her own story. I know nothing about this lady or her story, but, this isn’t the Amanda Knox story, so inserting yourself interrupts the flow of the podcast. Additionally, these episodes are 30 minutes and have about 4-5 commercial breaks which also disrupts the story. There needs to be less, probably 2-3 for that short of a show. The flow is interrupted by both of these things. Lastly, the show went on entirely too long. Episode 10 is a complete waste and was unneeded. Safe yourself the time and skip it. A lot of the show could have been condensed but seems to drag on for advertisement purposes. The material is good but the editing needs so much work that I give it 2 out of 5 stars.
We strive to present a balanced view by showing a diverse range of reviews from Apple Podcasts.
Popular shows in True Crime, for your next listen.
Daily updated Apple Podcasts rankings for the United States.
Here you find the Apple Podcasts chart positions of THREE, its latest episodes to listen to directly, and reviews from listeners. Rankings are updated daily for the United States.
Questions or issues? Reach us at hello@reason.fm