I like the idea of this show and support it continuing but I'd like to see a little more insight and analsys from Cheyna and Zach. They present data unfiltered which is a nice change from the non-stop thinkpieces, name-dropping and me-me-me presentations of other political shows but sometimes they are a little too passive. The 12/20/24 show on the MI House issues was a good example. They sort of just read the transcript (The house did not have a quorum. The call to house took place. The house was adjouned after an hour). Why? They and the guest reporter talked about one rep who was sore about the bills being brought up but was that all of it? Even if they don't know, I'd appreciate it if they took some time to theorize or offer ideas and put it in context with their other sources and reporting.
Good foundation for a show, just needs a little more curation and editing. Michigan state politics is an utter black hole so I am glad to see a show like this and hope it continues.
Read more
We strive to present a balanced view by showing a diverse range of reviews from Apple Podcasts
