Personal Journals · Vox Media Podcast Network
by Vox Media Podcast Network
In Her Shoes from the Cut is a weekly conversation between a special guest and Lindsay Peoples, The Cut's Editor-in-Chief, exploring culture, style, sex, politics and more. Intimate, provocative, and probing, the Cut aims to ask questions before listeners even know they have them, always with a generous wit and an expansive idea of what is possible. From New York Magazine and The Vox Media Podcast Network. New episodes every other Wednesday.
Showing 20 · updated from the feed
Position in the Personal Journals chart (US), last 90 days.
Where The Cut ranks today in each Apple Podcasts chart (US, Oct 5, 2026).
A curated, balanced selection of Apple Podcasts reviews.
I started listening to The Cut’s podcast when Avery Trufelman was hired and stuck with it after she left. The narrative story telling and deeper dives into topics covered in the magazine were great. Since the podcast has exclusively become the “In Her Shoes” conversations it has gone downhill. The range of guests is great but the questions are often very surface and don’t make connections to a larger story. Like how does the podcast connect to the magazine now, other than the fact that Lindsay hosts it? Also, the episode intro where Lindsay says these are people we love, admire “or just find interesting” sounds SO condescending to me. I think The Cut needs to invest in rebuilding the podcast staff and finding a new vision for the content or just stop doing the pod.
I agree strongly with another reviewer who said we could use more of the 2019-style episodes where the interviews felt intentional and not like something to just fill up the feed. There was also another reviewer who said this podcast may be too young for them, a millennial, and that it might be more for Gen Z. I am Gen Z and this stiff, generic production style definitely does not appeal to us either. It seems very millennial to me. That “mhmm? mhmm” is so annoying. It sounds like some consultant said you have to add a bunch of royalty-free-sounding music behind the host reading off a script. It could use a more conversational tone.
I always enjoy the episodes but what is going on with this show? All of the hosts the past few years have been great and the stories give the essence of what I like about The Cut but there is no consistency. I am genuinely curious why they keep changing hosts and take breaks from putting out episodes.
I like this podcast, the topics are interesting and short enough to listen in one sitting. But there’s one thing that makes me reach for the pause button as fast as I can—vocal fry. I would love to, in the nicest way possible, just suggest to some of the reporters to have some awareness of the podcast as an audio medium and to try to speak in a normal, unaffected way.
As a faithful “Sound Opinions” listener, I enjoyed hearing a different take on the R. Kelly debacle on this podcast. However, I found it journalistically questionable to not directly credit Jim Derogatis, and instead just refer to “that columnist at the Chicago Sun-Times”.
I’m sure Lindsay is a talented and intelligent person, but being talented does not mean you will be a good podcast host; it is a specific skill set that clearly goes unappreciated by this publication. The production and conception of each episode feel like an afterthought. It’s just an all-around bad look for The Cut. Clearly nobody is permitted to give The Boss any honest feedback.
We strive to present a balanced view by showing a diverse range of reviews from Apple Podcasts.
Popular shows in Personal Journals, for your next listen.
Daily updated Apple Podcasts rankings for the United States.
Here you find the Apple Podcasts chart positions of The Cut, its latest episodes to listen to directly, and reviews from listeners. Rankings are updated daily for the United States.
Questions or issues? Reach us at hello@reason.fm