History · BBC Radio 4
by BBC Radio 4
From Altruism to Wittgenstein, philosophers, theories and key themes.
Showing 20 · updated from the feed
Position in the History chart (US), last 90 days.
Where In Our Time: Philosophy ranks today in each Apple Podcasts chart (US, Oct 14, 2026).
A curated, balanced selection of Apple Podcasts reviews.
Overall a very interesting series of discussions. What’s strange is that Melvyn Bragg knows nothing about philosophy. And that’s not necessarily a bad thing. It lets the guests speak in much longer, more insightful discourses. With hosts who know the topic they tend to burst in a lot to show their bona fides. Melvyn does the opposite, which makes for a better conversation. The one big drawback is that the guests are often lost as to how to answer his leads. He’ll say something like “tell me about Plato”, which is ridiculously broad in what is meant to be a much narrower topic. Once they regain their composure they do a good job of turning the conversation back to the topic.
I’ve been scrolling through the old episodes and listening to the ones that stand out to me. I like the format and I like the Tid-bit approach to topics. It’s not overpowering and they don’t go deep down in rabbit holes. Just enough to give you the gist of it.
Most of the programs and conversations are very good. The guests and Melvynn usually have a great chemistry. I do have a criticism, which is that Melvynn tends to interrupt guests during inopportune times, just as they are getting to share a relevant or important point. Other than that, the conversations are usually very interesting, and flow quite well.
This show provides a rigorous introduction to a variety of philosophies, making for an easy listen. It provides a great refresher for those with some previous knowledge of the subject(s) but it might move too fast for the uninitiated. My only complaint is that frequently the main host moves too quickly through points, particularly during his introductions to the subject of the day. But the rewind button exists, so I can’t really complain.
Rather than discussing feminism writ large, this episode uncritically accepted gender essentialism. Dr. Helena Cronin’s theories are insidious, and she argues them as if gender essentialism is a spicy new theory rather than the justification of misogynistic oppression for millennia. Her pontification about the myriad ways in which men are superior to women (e.g. that they “persevere” and are “more ambitious”) went utterly unchallenged by the host or fellow guest Germaine Greer. It was stunning to hear an academic so committed to making sweeping generalizations like this. Why was nobody invited on who might challenge such potentially harmful normative statements, the critique of which is part of the intellectual gift of feminist tradition? Dr. Cronin’s belief in a society that should be arranged based on “good Darwinian science” seems to feel no obligation towards women and girls who have been oppressed for centuries based on alleged biological differences, which have usually been seen as inferiorities. A very disappointing episode for anyone hoping for sophisticated feminist argument.
I cannot stand how frequently this man interrupts and speaks over women in this podcast. It is distracting, especially when this behavior isn’t mirrored with male guests. Lovely subject matter and guests, however, I can’t stand the host.
We strive to present a balanced view by showing a diverse range of reviews from Apple Podcasts.
Popular shows in History, for your next listen.
Daily updated Apple Podcasts rankings for the United States.
Here you find the Apple Podcasts chart positions of In Our Time: Philosophy, its latest episodes to listen to directly, and reviews from listeners. Rankings are updated daily for the United States.
Questions or issues? Reach us at hello@reason.fm