Philosophy · Alex J O'Connor
by Alex J O'Connor
For the curious. A philosophy podcast that sometimes flirts with other disciplines, Within Reason has featured guests including Richard Dawkins, Douglas Murray, William Lane Craig, Peter Singer, Konstantin Kisin, and Neil deGrasse Tyson.
Showing 20 · updated from the feed
Position in the Philosophy chart (US), last 90 days.
Where Within Reason ranks today in each Apple Podcasts chart (US, Sep 15, 2026).
A curated, balanced selection of Apple Podcasts reviews.
I’ve been searching for a podcast that is balanced and not as dogmatic as so many I’ve come across. Admittedly it tests my understanding and at times is uncomfortable. However I always come away with a better perspective from which to form an opinion or at least continue to research. To the extent that Alex gives respect to his guests and is so diverse in his knowledge is the very reason I listen.
I just started listening and the guests are amazing. Great conversations with Bernardo Kastrup, Annika Harris, and Hank Green, to name a few. The ad insertions are crazy making though. They pop in randomly, mid-thought. My ADHD brain always loses the thread for a moment. This is the only podcast I listen to that does this. Can it be addressed?
Great podcast - host actually engages resourcefully and critically with ideas for people genuinely curious about biblical criticism / religion - and isn’t just doing “love to hate” or “preaching to the choir” style content
For me, Alex O’Connor’s show is a mixed bag. On the one hand, he does bring on people who are genuinely experts in their field or at least know what they’re talking about. I love that he’s had on Bart Ehrman, Andrew Mark Henry (Religion for Breakfast), Justin Sledge (Esoterica) and Filip Holm (Let’s Talk Religion). He is actually making an effort to talk about religion from a historical, academic standpoint instead of doing those atheist takedowns of religion that give irreligious people a bad name. At the same time, there are also episodes that demonstrate my main issue with famous philosophers. They make blanket assumptions about history that isn’t backed up by anything. For example, on episode #55, Robert Sapolsky claims that cultures from the desert tend to be monotheistic while cultures from the rain forests tend to be polytheistic. Before the Abrahamic religions, however, basically every society was polytheistic (people like to bring up Zoroastrianism but even that had divinities besides Ahura Mazda). This blanket assumptions, which is based in the idea that Abrahamic religions represent all of religious history, kind of undermines Sapolsky’s premise. It’s not just him. I see this issue of making blanket assumptions about history that often aren’t even true among many philosophers on these types of shows.
What a disappointment. Over and over again I hear the podcaster fail to notice, much less represent, serious flaws in the arguments, offered by the guests on the show. The meek acceptance of sloppy thinking and outright ignorance from Ross Douthat was particularly frustrating. The lack of critical engagement harms this podcast’s credibility.
Great podcast ruined by intrusive & jarring midroll ads. Midroll may be more lucrative but I stopped listening to the podcast because of them
We strive to present a balanced view by showing a diverse range of reviews from Apple Podcasts.
Popular shows in Philosophy, for your next listen.
Daily updated Apple Podcasts rankings for the United States.
Here you find the Apple Podcasts chart positions of Within Reason, its latest episodes to listen to directly, and reviews from listeners. Rankings are updated daily for the United States.
Questions or issues? Reach us at hello@reason.fm