Business News · Bloomberg
by Bloomberg
Expert analysis on legal issues and cases in the news. Host June Grasso speaks with prominent attorneys and scholars on the legal stories making news and shaping the world.
Showing 20 · updated from the feed
Position in the Business News chart (US), last 90 days.
Where Bloomberg Law ranks today in each Apple Podcasts chart (US, Oct 3, 2026).
A curated, balanced selection of Apple Podcasts reviews.
This is essentially a re-broadcast of the Bloomberg Law radio show, I get it that a lot of the guests calling in for the interviews don’t have great audio setups, but I wish an editor would do something to equalize the volume at least. Some of the guests are extremely muffled requiring the volume to be adjusted frequently between the hosts questions and their answers. Also the updates have been very infrequent the last few weeks, nothing for days and then 2-3 episodes drop all at once. When it’s a news podcast, the consistent daily and timely nature is sort of important! Finally I wish the host would at least pretend to be a little politically neutral, this show has skewed way to the left, it has always leaned a bit that way, but since Trump’s second term started it’s been a non-stop bashing his administration and the Robert’s court. I’m not saying I disagree, but some balance and the occasional right-leaning guest would be a refreshing change of pace.
These episodes are really digestible, fun, interesting and topical. My only complaint is the audio. June’s audio is perfectly clear, but the guest audio is often fuzzy and garbled, and at a much different volume than June. So you need to blast it to make out what the guest is saying, but then June is uncomfortably loud. Can’t they hire a mixing person? It feels bizarrely low budget.
So much great content for current legal cases, but I’m amazed at the poor audio of so many guests. Some may be recording under less than perfect circumstances, but do a sound check and ask them to adjust their mics! And please don’t have guests with vocal fry — that’s when I turn off the pod.
As many others have mentioned, the content is great and very informative, however the sound design is terrible. Ads play at 3x the volume of the host and call in guests can barely be heard sometimes. For such a large company this is a shame and easily fixed. I hope they do soon.
The podcast used to cover interesting legal issues in a neutral way, but that changed dramatically over the last few years. Now, June speaks with guests from a singular viewpoint and covers only political topics. She barely asks questions; instead, she makes breathless statements with which the guests then agree. And on top of that, June offers no insightful analysis. I’m not sure if she’s always been a blind partisan without any real insight on the law, but the last few years have certainly revealed her as such.
It used to be a little more balanced, but it has become overtly political and a little ranty. I like to understand both sides of an issue (especially in SCOTUS cases), but there is no attempt to toward balanced coverage or even explaining the other side's perspective. I am registered Independent and generally vote Democrat so I often agree with the positions but I wish the presentation was more balanced. June makes a big deal about SCOTUS's low approval ratings, but media's is even lower and I suspect it is because of partisan bias like this.
We strive to present a balanced view by showing a diverse range of reviews from Apple Podcasts.
Popular shows in Business News, for your next listen.
Daily updated Apple Podcasts rankings for the United States.
Here you find the Apple Podcasts chart positions of Bloomberg Law, its latest episodes to listen to directly, and reviews from listeners. Rankings are updated daily for the United States.
Questions or issues? Reach us at hello@reason.fm