Our curated selection of reviews
The correlation between Dante’s Inferno and Ramirez’s life is amazing. I’ve listened to all the episodes twice. It’s given me a re-appreciation for the literature I was required to read as a teenager. Well done!
Read more
This is a refreshing podcast. Not just grizzly facts. It is well written, informative, and educational. I now want to read Duante’s inferno. A true crime podcast that should become a novella.
Read more
I love the tangents on history and the comparisons to famous texts. I’ve always passed on The Devine Comedy, but now I think I’ll actually read it. Especially if Dante is as good as Branden claims.
Read more
Always impressed by the writing and presentation. Really engaging and entertaining, much better than most true crime podcasts. The interweaving of history and parallel stories works nicely. Don’t really understand the low ratings - volume too low -really?
Read more
This “author” took a real crime and turned it into his own fictionalized Creepypasta in a way I’m not even sure should be legal. The “facts” of the Sullivan case that he uses to shore up his supernatural fantasy are completely fabricated. And his weak excuse that he has access to some secret files is as questionable as the rest of this mess. If you want to write fiction, write fiction. This is just gross and the guy making money off it should be ashamed.
Read more
I first noticed the host calling the killer by the wrong name in season 2. Later he got the name of a fraternal organization wrong while claiming it is satanic. During the bigfoot episode he repeatedly called the famous Patterson Gimlin film “Peterson Gimlin.”
I don’t mind him considering himself more of a storyteller than a documentarian, but if you’re going to talk about real people and organizations, get the names right.
Read more
We strive to present a balanced view by showing a diverse range of reviews from Apple Podcasts