Piers Morgan Uncensored - Podcast Rankings and reviews

Piers is very malleable in his views but not his principles and I appreciate that - he clearly knows what he stands for but doesn’t mind expanding or changing his perspective as to why. He listens to a lot of perspectives and brings many angles to help develop a panoramic understanding of the topic at hand. This show stands out to me because Piers is so willing to entertain views that he disagrees with and even allows himself to admit when someone is right when he doesn’t agree. I wish some of the personal attacks and insignificant jabs that people throw at each other would disappear because it interrupts people’s points that I find intriguing but then they don’t get to finish because people act like sensitive high schoolers that have to defend themselves. Overall though it’s a great listen to help you fully understand all of the reasons of the current topic they are discussing - others should model this presentation of material

I’ve listened to probably 10 or so episodes, and I like Piers’s interview style. Sort of confrontational at times, but he manages to not overstep and keep people talking. He’s willing to change his mind on things and allow that his previous views or statements may have been misguided or ill-considered.

He asks salient questions that get to the heart of an issue, which can come across as both muck-raking and in good faith at the same time. He seems like an honest guy that I would like to have a beer with, a sentiment that I seldom feel for erudite Brits.

The only part of the show that I don’t like so much is when there are panels of multiple people talking over one another, but that format might be more tolerable if I were watching it on YouTube. All in all, a great show with lots of education and entertainment value, and I wholeheartedly recommend giving it a listen.

Love Piers Morgan and love how you bring people on total opposite spectrums to debate each other. It’s very entertaining the only reason I didn’t give it 5 stars is because sometimes they often interrupt and talk over one another and it gets to be over the top. Other than that love this podcast.

This episode was awful. Piers i think we should probably let both guests speak more than 10 words before speaking over them. I don’t support Natasha’s beliefs but i think she should atleast be able to talk i mean that’s the whole point. And then Dave gets brought on and we let him talk interrupted. Love the show but this specific episode was brutal

I love the topics, and the guests, and even the host. The way this show is produced seemingly entirely over online chats however makes it un-listenable. Everyone is constantly talking over each other because of the lag and delays. I expected much better from such a widely recognized and respected personality…

I listened often for a number of months but recently had to realize that hearing people yell at each other must be raising my subconscious anxiety and my blood pressure.

90% of the time the topic is fascinating but the show clearly monopolizes the ugliest side of debate. It’s easy to blame several guests who make it un-listenable, but there’s not even a mute button for the worst offenders... Morgan just yells over everyone in order to (supposedly) get them to stop yelling over everyone. At some point one has to realize it’s not the guests’ fault but the moderator’s. He also instigates argument with the longest statements that he then plays off as “questions.” Once you catch his pattern of “questioning” by using drawn out debatable opinions, you can’t not hear it.

This show is not worth the ugliness it pours into you—even if it’s subconsciously consumed. I had to unsubscribe.