The Ellen Fisher Podcast - Podcast Rankings and reviews

I’ve followed Ellen for a long time. She is truly an intelligent and inspiring woman. Ellen holds strong views and is true to her own values but is excellent at opening the door to hear opposing viewpoints. The way she communicates and has respectful, thought-provoking conversations is something that is missing in today’s society of polarizing and harsh group-think. I value the subjects Ellen talks about and always look forward to expanding my mind or perspective on things.

Ellen is my queen!! I love the way she asks hard questions and is curious about other people’s perspective on polarizing topics. You’ll learn something new in every episode weather it be information in general or understanding someone else’s side on an issue you’ve made your own mind up about. Highly recommend giving it a listen.

We need more platforms for HEALTHY debates and this podcast it IT. It’s always packed full of good information and explores multiple perspectives. Ellen’s genuine curiosity is exactly what makes it so balanced and insightful!

In a world where we don't have respectful, fact-based disagreements, Ellen’s podcast is an absolute light in the darkness. So grateful for her courageous and kind approach to tough topics and her ability to bring people together in a way that encourages thoughtful conversation. 10/10 recommend!

I love Ellen, and never imagined I’d give a low review for any of her work, but there’s no denying how disappointing the podcast has been. I don’t doubt Ellen’s sincerity in attempting to make the conversations as non-biased and equal as possible but unfortunately it falls short in application. I think this is for a few reasons:

1. Everyone has biases regardless of each individual’s ability to be as unbiased as possible. Given this, Ellen is more knowledgeable about the experts that subscribe to her beliefs and therefore has no problem “finding” the best of the best on her side of the debate.

2. It’s common public knowledge where Ellen stands on many of the issues in her debates (veganism, pro life, monogamy, etc), therefore when she attempts to get those of equal stature to debate alongside the experts on her side, they’re not interested. Therefore, she has to find those that are interested, which inevitably makes the debate a landslide for her side. It’s really frustrating to witness such poor representations for “the other side”.

Perfect example being Plant-based vs Carnivore. Simon Hill vs Dr. Robert Kiltz. The obvious choice against Simon Hill was Dr. Paul Saladino and yes Ellen did try to get him to come on but was unsuccessful… therefore ending up with Dr. Robert Kiltz who was such an embarrassment.

Other examples include Allie Stuckey vs Desmond Fambrini and Ellen and Andrew vs their friends Amelia and Matt. They could’ve had an excellent debate with Amanda Bucci and John Romaniello for example instead (who I’m sure would’ve said yes and are so eloquently spoken).

Again, I’m sure this is not the intent but it is the unfortunate reality. It seems very clear to me Ellen wants the podcast to be a place of learning and growth and not a place of confirming/compounding biases. So I send this review in hopes of change. A rematch with Amanda Bucci and John Romaniello on monogamy vs non monogamy would be a phenomenal start.